On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 9:25 AM Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> @@ -1045,12 +1045,6 @@ static int mtk_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ret = mipi_dsi_host_register(&dsi->host);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to register DSI host: %d\n", ret);
> - goto err_ddp_comp_unregister;
> - }
> -
> ret = mtk_dsi_create_conn_enc(drm, dsi);
> if (ret) {
> DRM_ERROR("Encoder create failed with %d\n", ret);
> @@ -1060,8 +1054,6 @@ static int mtk_dsi_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data)
> return 0;
>
> err_unregister:
> - mipi_dsi_host_unregister(&dsi->host);
> -err_ddp_comp_unregister:
> mtk_ddp_comp_unregister(drm, &dsi->ddp_comp);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -1097,31 +1089,37 @@ static int mtk_dsi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> dsi->host.ops = &mtk_dsi_ops;
> dsi->host.dev = dev;
> + dsi->dev = dev;
> + ret = mipi_dsi_host_register(&dsi->host);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to register DSI host: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
>
Since mipi_dsi_host_register() is moved from .bind to .probe,
mipi_dsi_host_unregister() should also be moved from .unbind to
.remove?
Thanks
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
