Re: drm-sync timeline signaling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks David,

Initially I thought we could run into wait issues with a dma_fence_chain with a value = 0, but you're right, it works fine.

We could just avoid to create a dma_fence_chain object, but maybe we don't care.

-Lionel

On 21/05/2019 09:51, zhoucm1 wrote:
Sorry for late response.

Although we don't expect that, drm_syncobj_timeline_signal_ioctl already handle this case I think. Which can handle both (point value > 0) and (point value = 0).


-David


On 2019年05月21日 16:44, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
[CAUTION: External Email]

Ping?

On 16/05/2019 15:49, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
Hi all,

While picking up the IGT tests for timeline syncobj,
I noticed that although we deal with multi wait across both timeline
(with point value > 0) and binary (point value = 0) syncobjs,
we don't seem to have a similar behavior with signaling.

Do you have any thought on this?
I'm considering writing some docs but I'm not quite sure whether this
difference between signaling/waiting was intentional or just overlooked.

Thanks,

-Lionel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel





_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux