## TLDR I mostly wanted to incorporate feedback I got over the last week and a half. Biggest things to look out for: - KUnit core now outputs results in TAP14. - Heavily reworked tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py - Changed how parsing works. - Added testing. - Greg, Logan, you might want to re-review this. - Added documentation on how to use KUnit on non-UML kernels. You can see the docs rendered here[1]. There is still some discussion going on on the [PATCH v2 00/17] thread, but I wanted to get some of these updates out before they got too stale (and too difficult for me to keep track of). I hope no one minds. ## Background This patch set proposes KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. Unlike Autotest and kselftest, KUnit is a true unit testing framework; it does not require installing the kernel on a test machine or in a VM (however, KUnit still allows you to run tests on test machines or in VMs if you want) and does not require tests to be written in userspace running on a host kernel. Additionally, KUnit is fast: From invocation to completion KUnit can run several dozen tests in under a second. Currently, the entire KUnit test suite for KUnit runs in under a second from the initial invocation (build time excluded). KUnit is heavily inspired by JUnit, Python's unittest.mock, and Googletest/Googlemock for C++. KUnit provides facilities for defining unit test cases, grouping related test cases into test suites, providing common infrastructure for running tests, mocking, spying, and much more. ## What's so special about unit testing? A unit test is supposed to test a single unit of code in isolation, hence the name. There should be no dependencies outside the control of the test; this means no external dependencies, which makes tests orders of magnitudes faster. Likewise, since there are no external dependencies, there are no hoops to jump through to run the tests. Additionally, this makes unit tests deterministic: a failing unit test always indicates a problem. Finally, because unit tests necessarily have finer granularity, they are able to test all code paths easily solving the classic problem of difficulty in exercising error handling code. ## Is KUnit trying to replace other testing frameworks for the kernel? No. Most existing tests for the Linux kernel are end-to-end tests, which have their place. A well tested system has lots of unit tests, a reasonable number of integration tests, and some end-to-end tests. KUnit is just trying to address the unit test space which is currently not being addressed. ## More information on KUnit There is a bunch of documentation near the end of this patch set that describes how to use KUnit and best practices for writing unit tests. For convenience I am hosting the compiled docs here[2]. Additionally for convenience, I have applied these patches to a branch[3]. The repo may be cloned with: git clone https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux This patchset is on the kunit/rfc/v5.1/v3 branch. ## Changes Since Last Version - Converted KUnit core to print test results in TAP14 format as suggested by Greg and Frank. - Heavily reworked tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py - Changed how parsing works. - Added testing. - Added documentation on how to use KUnit on non-UML kernels. You can see the docs rendered here[1]. - Added a new set of EXPECTs and ASSERTs for pointer comparison. - Removed more function indirection as suggested by Logan. - Added a new patch that adds `kunit_try_catch_throw` to objtool's noreturn list. - Fixed a number of minorish issues pointed out by Shuah, Masahiro, and kbuild bot. [1] https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/usage.html#kunit-on-non-uml-architectures [2] https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/ [3] https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux/+/kunit/rfc/v5.1/v3 -- 2.21.0.1020.gf2820cf01a-goog _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
