On Wed, 2019-05-08 at 15:20 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 02:28:35PM +0300, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:
> > -static const char * const phy_types[] = {
> > - "emmc 5.0 phy",
> > - "emmc 5.1 phy"
> > -};
> > -
> > enum xenon_phy_type_enum {
> > EMMC_5_0_PHY,
> > EMMC_5_1_PHY,
> > NR_PHY_TYPES
>
> There is no need for NR_PHY_TYPES now so you could remove that as well.
>
I thought the same.
The only reason to keep NR_PHY_TYPES, is for potential future patches,
where it would be just 1 addition
enum xenon_phy_type_enum {
EMMC_5_0_PHY,
EMMC_5_1_PHY,
+ EMMC_5_2_PHY,
NR_PHY_TYPES
}
Depending on style/preference of how to do enums (allow comma on last enum
or not allow comma on last enum value), adding new enum values woudl be 2
additions + 1 deletion lines.
enum xenon_phy_type_enum {
EMMC_5_0_PHY,
- EMMC_5_1_PHY
+ EMM
C_5_1_PHY,
+ EMMC_5_2_PHY
}
Either way (leave NR_PHY_TYPES or remove NR_PHY_TYPES) is fine from my
side.
Thanks
Alex
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
