Am 07.05.19 um 13:37 schrieb Thomas Hellstrom:
> [CAUTION: External Email]
>
> On 5/7/19 1:24 PM, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 07.05.19 um 13:22 schrieb zhoucm1:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2019年05月07日 19:13, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>>>> Am 07.05.19 um 13:08 schrieb zhoucm1:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2019年05月07日 18:53, Koenig, Christian wrote:
>>>>>> Am 07.05.19 um 11:36 schrieb Chunming Zhou:
>>>>>>> heavy gpu job could occupy memory long time, which lead other user
>>>>>>> fail to get memory.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> basically pick up Christian idea:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Reserve the BO in DC using a ww_mutex ticket (trivial).
>>>>>>> 2. If we then run into this EBUSY condition in TTM check if the BO
>>>>>>> we need memory for (or rather the ww_mutex of its reservation
>>>>>>> object) has a ticket assigned.
>>>>>>> 3. If we have a ticket we grab a reference to the first BO on the
>>>>>>> LRU, drop the LRU lock and try to grab the reservation lock with
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> ticket.
>>>>>>> 4. If getting the reservation lock with the ticket succeeded we
>>>>>>> check if the BO is still the first one on the LRU in question (the
>>>>>>> BO could have moved).
>>>>>>> 5. If the BO is still the first one on the LRU in question we
>>>>>>> try to
>>>>>>> evict it as we would evict any other BO.
>>>>>>> 6. If any of the "If's" above fail we just back off and return
>>>>>>> -EBUSY.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> v2: fix some minor check
>>>>>>> v3: address Christian v2 comments.
>>>>>>> v4: fix some missing
>>>>>>> v5: handle first_bo unlock and bo_get/put
>>>>>>> v6: abstract unified iterate function, and handle all possible
>>>>>>> usecase not only pinned bo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Change-Id: I21423fb922f885465f13833c41df1e134364a8e7
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 113
>>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> index 8502b3ed2d88..bbf1d14d00a7 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
>>>>>>> @@ -766,11 +766,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_eviction_valuable);
>>>>>>> * b. Otherwise, trylock it.
>>>>>>> */
>>>>>>> static bool ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>>> - struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx, bool *locked)
>>>>>>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx, bool *locked, bool
>>>>>>> *busy)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> bool ret = false;
>>>>>>> *locked = false;
>>>>>>> + if (busy)
>>>>>>> + *busy = false;
>>>>>>> if (bo->resv == ctx->resv) {
>>>>>>> reservation_object_assert_held(bo->resv);
>>>>>>> if (ctx->flags & TTM_OPT_FLAG_ALLOW_RES_EVICT
>>>>>>> @@ -779,35 +781,45 @@ static bool
>>>>>>> ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>>> } else {
>>>>>>> *locked = reservation_object_trylock(bo->resv);
>>>>>>> ret = *locked;
>>>>>>> + if (!ret && busy)
>>>>>>> + *busy = true;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> -static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>>>>>> - uint32_t mem_type,
>>>>>>> - const struct ttm_place *place,
>>>>>>> - struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
>>>>>>> +static struct ttm_buffer_object*
>>>>>>> +ttm_mem_find_evitable_bo(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>>>>>> + struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man,
>>>>>>> + const struct ttm_place *place,
>>>>>>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
>>>>>>> + struct ttm_buffer_object **first_bo,
>>>>>>> + bool *locked)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> - struct ttm_bo_global *glob = bdev->glob;
>>>>>>> - struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man = &bdev->man[mem_type];
>>>>>>> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = NULL;
>>>>>>> - bool locked = false;
>>>>>>> - unsigned i;
>>>>>>> - int ret;
>>>>>>> + int i;
>>>>>>> - spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>>>>>> + if (first_bo)
>>>>>>> + *first_bo = NULL;
>>>>>>> for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
>>>>>>> list_for_each_entry(bo, &man->lru[i], lru) {
>>>>>>> - if (!ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx, &locked))
>>>>>>> + bool busy = false;
>>>>>>> + if (!ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx, locked,
>>>>>>> + &busy)) {
>>>>>> A newline between declaration and code please.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> + if (first_bo && !(*first_bo) && busy) {
>>>>>>> + ttm_bo_get(bo);
>>>>>>> + *first_bo = bo;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> if (place &&
>>>>>>> !bdev->driver->eviction_valuable(bo,
>>>>>>> place)) {
>>>>>>> - if (locked)
>>>>>>> + if (*locked)
>>>>>>> reservation_object_unlock(bo->resv);
>>>>>>> continue;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> @@ -818,9 +830,66 @@ static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>>>>>> bo = NULL;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> + return bo;
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> +static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>>>>>> + uint32_t mem_type,
>>>>>>> + const struct ttm_place *place,
>>>>>>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + struct ttm_bo_global *glob = bdev->glob;
>>>>>>> + struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man = &bdev->man[mem_type];
>>>>>>> + struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = NULL, *first_bo = NULL;
>>>>>>> + bool locked = false;
>>>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>>>>>> + bo = ttm_mem_find_evitable_bo(bdev, man, place, ctx,
>>>>>>> &first_bo,
>>>>>>> + &locked);
>>>>>>> if (!bo) {
>>>>>>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx busy_ctx;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>>>>>> - return -EBUSY;
>>>>>>> + /* check if other user occupy memory too long time */
>>>>>>> + if (!first_bo || !ctx || !ctx->resv ||
>>>>>>> !ctx->resv->lock.ctx) {
>>>>>>> + if (first_bo)
>>>>>>> + ttm_bo_put(first_bo);
>>>>>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> + if (first_bo->resv == ctx->resv) {
>>>>>>> + ttm_bo_put(first_bo);
>>>>>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> + if (ctx->interruptible)
>>>>>>> + ret =
>>>>>>> ww_mutex_lock_interruptible(&first_bo->resv->lock,
>>>>>>> + ctx->resv->lock.ctx);
>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>> + ret = ww_mutex_lock(&first_bo->resv->lock,
>>>>>>> ctx->resv->lock.ctx);
>>>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>>>> + ttm_bo_put(first_bo);
>>>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> + spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>>>>>> + /* previous busy resv lock is held by above, idle now,
>>>>>>> + * so let them evictable.
>>>>>>> + */
>>>>>>> + busy_ctx.interruptible = ctx->interruptible;
>>>>>>> + busy_ctx.no_wait_gpu = ctx->no_wait_gpu;
>>>>>>> + busy_ctx.resv = first_bo->resv;
>>>>>>> + busy_ctx.flags = TTM_OPT_FLAG_ALLOW_RES_EVICT;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + bo = ttm_mem_find_evitable_bo(bdev, man, place, &busy_ctx,
>>>>>>> NULL,
>>>>>>> + &locked);
>>>>>>> + if (bo && (bo->resv == first_bo->resv))
>>>>>>> + locked = true;
>>>>>>> + else if (bo)
>>>>>>> + ww_mutex_unlock(&first_bo->resv->lock);
>>>>>>> + if (!bo) {
>>>>>>> + spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>>>>>> + ttm_bo_put(first_bo);
>>>>>>> + return -EBUSY;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> kref_get(&bo->list_kref);
>>>>>>> @@ -829,11 +898,15 @@ static int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_bo_device *bdev,
>>>>>>> ret = ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(bo, ctx->interruptible,
>>>>>>> ctx->no_wait_gpu, locked);
>>>>>>> kref_put(&bo->list_kref, ttm_bo_release_list);
>>>>>>> + if (first_bo)
>>>>>>> + ttm_bo_put(first_bo);
>>>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> ttm_bo_del_from_lru(bo);
>>>>>>> spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>>>>>> + if (first_bo)
>>>>>>> + ttm_bo_put(first_bo);
>>>>>>> ret = ttm_bo_evict(bo, ctx);
>>>>>>> if (locked) {
>>>>>>> @@ -899,6 +972,13 @@ static int ttm_bo_mem_force_space(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> struct ttm_bo_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
>>>>>>> struct ttm_mem_type_manager *man = &bdev->man[mem_type];
>>>>>>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx native_ctx = {
>>>>>>> + .interruptible = false,
>>>>>>> + .no_wait_gpu = false,
>>>>>>> + .resv = bo->resv,
>>>>>>> + .flags = 0
>>>>>>> + };
>>>>>>> + struct ttm_operation_ctx *evict_ctx = ctx ? ctx : &native_ctx;
>>>>>> I thought we made the ctx parameter mandatory, didn't we? Could be
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> I remember that incorrectly.
>>>>> Prike said he see ctx->resv is null, in that case, code doesn't run
>>>>> into busy path.
>>>>> Oh, as you mentioned here, we need add .resv=bo->resv for every
>>>>> ttm_operation_ctx. That's a huge change which will cross all vendor
>>>>> drivers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we just force to evaluate evict_ctx->resv = bo->resv? That means
>>>>> we just add one extra line: evict_ctx->resv = bo->resv. How about
>>>>> that?
>>>> Well only if ctx->resv is NULL, otherwise we would overwrite some
>>>> reservation context given by the driver.
>>>>
>>>> Probably better to give the acquir_ctx as separate parameter to
>>>> ttm_mem_evict_first().
>>> still put acquire_ctx into ttm_operation_ctx? Then that's same
>>> ctx->resv.
>>> Current problem is we don't pass resv anywhere except ALLOW_EVICT case.
>>> If you have concern for overwritten, we have to do ".resv = bo->resv"
>>> in every ttm_operation_ctx definitions.
>>
>> No, what I mean is to add the acquire_ctx as separate parameter to
>> ttm_mem_evict_first().
>>
>> E.g. we only need it in this function and it is actually not related
>> to the ttm operation context filled in by the driver.
>
>
> FWIW, I think it would be nice at some point to have a reservation
> context being part of the ttm operation context, so that validate and
> evict could do sleeping reservations, and have bos remain on the lru
> even when reserved...
Yeah, well that's exactly what the ctx->resv parameter is good for :)
And yes, we do keep the BOs on the LRU even when they are reserved.
Christian.
>
> /Thomas
>
>
>>
>> Christian.
>>
>>>
>>> -David
>>>>
>>>> Christian.
>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>>> Christian.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> int ret;
>>>>>>> do {
>>>>>>> @@ -907,7 +987,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_mem_force_space(struct
>>>>>>> ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>>> if (mem->mm_node)
>>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>> - ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, mem_type, place, ctx);
>>>>>>> + ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, mem_type, place,
>>>>>>> evict_ctx);
>>>>>>> if (unlikely(ret != 0))
>>>>>>> return ret;
>>>>>>> } while (1);
>>>>>>> @@ -1784,7 +1864,8 @@ int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_bo_global
>>>>>>> *glob,
>>>>>>> struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx)
>>>>>>> spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock);
>>>>>>> for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
>>>>>>> list_for_each_entry(bo, &glob->swap_lru[i], swap) {
>>>>>>> - if (ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx,
>>>>>>> &locked)) {
>>>>>>> + if (ttm_bo_evict_swapout_allowable(bo, ctx, &locked,
>>>>>>> + NULL)) {
>>>>>>> ret = 0;
>>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>> }
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> amd-gfx mailing list
>>> amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dri-devel mailing list
>> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
