On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:30:20 -0300, Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > In the Kernel side, these are crtc properties (since in the hardware, > underscan use the panel fitters, which are attached to the pipes). > Ideally we should make these as crtc properties too, but since xrandr > doesn't have support for them, we expose the atoms as output > properties. This is not the best solution, but making the kernel > underscan properties be output properties instead of crtc properties > would be even more wrong. However, we have set the precedent with panel fitting already and this is just a variation on that theme? My wish would be to be able describe the dst box of the framebuffer on the crtc as part of the mode. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
