On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:27:20 -0300, Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > Also return void instead of int. We have more than 100 callers and > no one checks for the return value. > > If this function fails the property won't be exposed by the get/set > ioctls, but we should probably survive. If this starts happening, > the solution will be to increase DRM_CONNECTOR_MAX_PROPERTY and > recompile the Kernel. Please add that to the error message and use printk_once() since we only really want to annoy the user the first time. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
