Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH] drm/doc: Make igts for cross-driver stuff mandatory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:11:36PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jan 2019, Daniel Stone <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If it helps, maybe we could draw up a list somewhere (README in igt?
> > wiki?) of which tests seem to pass generically across a few drivers,
> > which ones are expected to pass, which ones don't but really should,
> > etc. I'm currently running on imx-drm (complicated by hitting a
> > page-cache BUG!), and a couple of others are getting results from
> > rockchip, vc4, and msm. Those are pretty well supported and actively
> > maintained, so should give us a decent first cut at such a list.
> 
> See tests/intel-ci/README. igt supports test lists, we could maintain
> similar lists for different needs.

Anything with DRIVER_ANY in it should work. I just noticed that we have a
few generic tests with only DRIVER_INTEL|DRIVER_AMDGPU, those should be
DRIVER_ANY.

I think the best way to get there is to integrate vkms into our CI (I
think that's something we can justify, we'll benefit from the better
overall testsuite ecosystem too), then we'd get test results for every
commit&patch. And would have at least some way to make sure the DRIVER_ANY
tests are somewhat reasonable. Quick discussion with Martin and Arek on
irc says this is doable.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux