On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 01:52:20PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 12:24 PM Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Try to get the interconnect path for the GPU and vote for the maximum > > bandwidth to support all frequencies. This is needed for performance. > > Later we will want to scale the bandwidth based on the frequency to > > also optimize for power but that will require some device tree > > infrastructure that does not yet exist. > > > > v6: use icc_set_bw() instead of icc_set() > > v5: Remove hardcoded interconnect name and just use the default > > v4: Don't use a port string at all to skip the need for names in the DT > > v3: Use macros and change port string per Georgi Djakov > > > > Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig | 1 + > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c | 9 +++++++++ > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h | 3 +++ > > 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+) > > Presumably this should go in together with the bindings: > > - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10739233/ > - https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181220173026.3857-3-jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ...since bindings and code usually go in the same tree together. > > > As per discussion in v3 AKA v5 > <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10739231/>, we're trying to figure > out where to land this. ;-) I'm just a simple caveman driver developer. I'll let the adults figure out where to put what. LMK if you need a rebase on a different tree. Jordan -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel