On 17/01/19 14:33, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:19:18PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> The DRM device minor numbers are allocated according to the registration >> order. This causes confusion in cases where the registration order can >> change, or when, say, a modesetting capable device is preferred to be >> card0, and a rendering device is preferred to be card1. >> >> This patch adds similar functionality that is used in some other >> subsystems, where device minor numbers can be defined in DT bindings' >> aliases node. > > What other subsystem? I thought that minor numbers shouldn't be made uapi, > and that udev or similar is supposed to give you stable names ... Is that > not the case on SoC? I think at least i2c, spi and uart use DT aliases. I also have my doubts about this, but thought to post this to get some comments, as it does make life quite a bit easier =). Tomi -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
