On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 05:39:03PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved > forward a lot: > > - gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs/libraries, arm cross build > and a sysroot build (should address all the build/cross platform > concerns raised in the RFC discussions). > > - tests reorganized into subdirectories so that the i915-gem tests > don't clog the main/shared tests directory anymore > > - quite a few more non-intel people contributing/reviewing/committing > igt tests patches. > > I think this addresses all the concerns raised in the RFC discussions, > and assuming there's enough Acks and no new issues that pop up, we can > go ahead with this. > > 1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10648851/ > Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst > index a752aa561ea4..413915d6b7d2 100644 > --- a/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst > +++ b/Documentation/gpu/drm-uapi.rst > @@ -238,6 +238,13 @@ DRM specific patterns. Note that ENOTTY has the slightly unintuitive meaning of > Testing and validation > ====================== > > +Testing Requirements for userspace API > +-------------------------------------- > + > +New cross-driver userspace interface extensions, like new IOCTL, new KMS > +properties, new files in sysfs or anything else that constitutes an API change > +need to have driver-agnostic testcases in IGT for that feature. >From an aspirational point of view I am fine with this and you can have my Acked-by: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@xxxxxxx>. >From a practical point of view I would like to see a matrix of KMS APIs that are being validated and the drivers that have been tested. Otherwise, the next person that comes and tries to add a new IOCTL, KMS property or new file in sysfs is going to discover that he has subscribed to a much bigger task of getting enough KMS drivers testable in the first place. Best regards, Liviu > + > Validating changes with IGT > --------------------------- > > -- > 2.20.1 > -- ==================== | I would like to | | fix the world, | | but they're not | | giving me the | \ source code! / --------------- ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
