Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Compared to the RFC[1] no changes to the patch itself, but igt moved > forward a lot: > > - gitlab CI builds with: reduced configs/libraries, arm cross build > and a sysroot build (should address all the build/cross platform > concerns raised in the RFC discussions). > > - tests reorganized into subdirectories so that the i915-gem tests > don't clog the main/shared tests directory anymore > > - quite a few more non-intel people contributing/reviewing/committing > igt tests patches. > > I think this addresses all the concerns raised in the RFC discussions, > and assuming there's enough Acks and no new issues that pop up, we can > go ahead with this. > > 1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10648851/ > Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> igt is a bit awkward to work in (the mailing list is very noisy with the Intel CI being email-based instead of gitlab-based and most of the traffic being Intel), but it's the right place to be putting shared tests and hopefully that pain point goes away eventually using gitlab MRs. I think there are going to be some interesting questions on how to deal with things like KMS properties that aren't amenable to chamelium/writeback-based testing. However, we should default to requiring tests and only skip that when we agree collectively that something isn't testable currently. Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
