Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/tinydrm: Use damage helper for dirtyfb

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Den 14.01.2019 23.06, skrev David Lechner:
> On 1/11/19 2:12 PM, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
>> This switches to drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb() as the framebuffer dirty
>> handler. All flushing will now happen in the pipe functions.
>>
>> Also enable the damage plane property for all except repaper which can
>> only do full updates.
>>
>> ili9225:
>> This change made ili9225_init() equal to mipi_dbi_init() so use it.
>>
>> v2: Remove fb check in mipi_dbi_enable_flush() it can't be NULL
>>      (kbuild test robot)
>>
>> Cc: David Lechner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
>> ---
> 
> 
> ...
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/st7586.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/st7586.c
>> index a52bc3b02606..50e370ce5a59 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/st7586.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tinydrm/st7586.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>>   #include <video/mipi_display.h>
>>   +#include <drm/drm_damage_helper.h>
>>   #include <drm/drm_drv.h>
>>   #include <drm/drm_fb_cma_helper.h>
>>   #include <drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.h>
>> @@ -112,23 +113,15 @@ static int st7586_buf_copy(void *dst, struct
>> drm_framebuffer *fb,
>>       return ret;
>>   }
>>   -static int st7586_fb_dirty(struct drm_framebuffer *fb,
>> -               struct drm_file *file_priv, unsigned int flags,
>> -               unsigned int color, struct drm_clip_rect *clips,
>> -               unsigned int num_clips)
>> +static void st7586_fb_dirty(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, struct
>> drm_rect *rect)
>>   {
>>       struct tinydrm_device *tdev = fb->dev->dev_private;
>>       struct mipi_dbi *mipi = mipi_dbi_from_tinydrm(tdev);
>> -    struct drm_rect clip;
>> -    struct drm_rect *rect = &clip;
> 
> This function later modifies the fields of the struct pointed to by rect.
> Are all callers of this function OK with having it modified or should we
> make a local copy of rect and modify that instead?

It's safe to modify it. st7586_pipe_update() owns the structure and it
doesn't use it after calling st7586_fb_dirty().

Noralf.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux