>-----Original Message----- >From: Sharma, Shashank >Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 11:38 PM >To: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx>; intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Cc: Lankhorst, Maarten <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxx>; Syrjala, Ville ><ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxx>; Brian.Starkey@xxxxxxx >Subject: Re: [v2 02/14] drm: Add CEA extended tag blocks and HDR bitfield >macros > >Regards > >Shashank > > >On 12/12/2018 2:08 AM, Uma Shankar wrote: >> Add bit field and macro for extended tag in CEA block. Also, declare >> macros for HDR metadata block. >This should have been a part of patch, where these macros are being used, so >that we can see it being used properly. While re-basing can you please merge ? Idea was to define all new block additions and bit fields in 1 patch. But will add to respective patches where they are getting used as you mentioned. >> v2: Rebase >> >> Signed-off-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c >> index b506e36..106fd38 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c >> @@ -2843,6 +2843,22 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector >*connector, >> #define EDID_CEA_YCRCB422 (1 << 4) >> #define EDID_CEA_VCDB_QS (1 << 6) >> >> +#define DATA_BLOCK_EXTENDED_TAG 0x07 >Alignment should be one tab back, also I think we already have added >extended tag macro (for parsing YCBCR420 blocks) Ok, will drop this. >> +#define VIDEO_CAPABILITY_DATA_BLOCK 0x0 >> +#define VSVD_DATA_BLOCK 0x1 >Alignment one tab back This is some editor issue, change looks ok on applying. Will recheck while rebasing. >> +#define COLORIMETRY_DATA_BLOCK 0x5 >> +#define HDR_STATIC_METADATA_BLOCK 0x6 >> + >> +/* HDR Metadata Block: Bit fields */ >> +#define SUPPORTED_EOTF_MASK 0x3f >> +#define TRADITIONAL_GAMMA_SDR (0x1 << 0) >> +#define TRADITIONAL_GAMMA_HDR (0x1 << 1) >> +#define SMPTE_ST2084 (0x1 << 2) >> +#define FUTURE_EOTF (0x1 << 3) >why not properly call it HLG if we are adding a bit for it already ? Ok. Will update. Regards, Uma Shankar >> +#define RESERVED_EOTF (0x3 << 4) >> + >> +#define STATIC_METADATA_TYPE1 (0x1 << 0) >> + >> /* >> * Search EDID for CEA extension block. >> */ >- Shashank _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
