On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 05:48:14PM +0100, Marcus Lorentzon wrote:
> Then it would also be nice to define some rules in KMS of what should be
> modeset params and what should be properties. Modeset params seems hard
> to add (struct change) and properties seems very loosely defined and
> device specific. Having something in between would be nice (standard and
> easy to add), to make it easier to add things like plane z-order
> (instead of driver specific ioctls or properties).
> Maybe a new "atomic" modeset with just a list of {object_id,
> property_id, value} making all params into properties and modeset more
> dynamic. It would also solve the atomic modset, even with device
> specific properties and future features.
Great minds think alike ;) Exactly what I've suggested a few times
before. Unfortunately I haven't had the time to do any prototyping
yet.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
