On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 08:04:53PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 01:12:22PM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote: > > On 16 March 2012 23:23, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Rob Clark <rob.clark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> From: Rob Clark <rob@xxxxxx> > > >> > > >> Works in a similar way to get_file(), and is needed in cases such as > > >> when the exporter needs to also keep a reference to the dmabuf (that > > >> is later released with a dma_buf_put()), and possibly other similar > > >> cases. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <rob@xxxxxx> > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Thanks; pulled into for-next. > > I'm back from vacation and already grumpily complaining about dma-buf > patches ;-) For consistency with dma_buf_put we should call this > dma_buf_get instead of get_dma_buf ... I'll write a bikeshed patch on top > of your tree. Oops, there's already a dma_buf_get around - Rob and Dave pointed that out on irc to dense me. And I can't come up with a saner naming scheme. I'll retract my bikeshed. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@xxxxxxxx Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
