Hi, On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 12:09 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 10:49 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 18-12-18, 11:05, Doug Anderson wrote: > > > OK, it's fine with me to have the fallback, but if we do we should be > > > consistent about it and make sure it's in all the bindings and device > > > tree files... > > > > Sure. > > > > I am not sure what's the right way to do it is, i.e. should we keep the > > "operating-points-v2" string or not. > > Does having it buy you anything? Given the QCom one doesn't have any > frequency or voltage, I don't see how it would be useful to have it. ...but it does have a frequency, doesn't it? + compatible = "operating-points-v2-qcom-level"; + + opp-710000000 { + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <710000000>; + qcom,level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_TURBO_L1>; + }; -Doug _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel