On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 10:24:51AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 8:01 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:14:43PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > This is the much more correct fix for my earlier attempt at: > > > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/10/118 > > > > > > Short recap: > > > > > > - There's not actually a locking issue, it's just lockdep being a bit > > > too eager to complain about a possible deadlock. > > > > > > - Contrary to what I claimed the real problem is recursion on > > > kn->count. Greg pointed me at sysfs_break_active_protection(), used > > > by the scsi subsystem to allow a sysfs file to unbind itself. That > > > would be a real deadlock, which isn't what's happening here. Also, > > > breaking the active protection means we'd need to manually handle > > > all the lifetime fun. > > > > > > - With Rafael we discussed the task_work approach, which kinda works, > > > but has two downsides: It's a functional change for a lockdep > > > annotation issue, and it won't work for the bind file (which needs > > > to get the errno from the driver load function back to userspace). > > > > > > - Greg also asked why this never showed up: To hit this you need to > > > unregister a 2nd driver from the unload code of your first driver. I > > > guess only gpus do that. The bug has always been there, but only > > > with a recent patch series did we add more locks so that lockdep > > > built a chain from unbinding the snd-hda driver to the > > > acpi_video_unregister call. > > > > > > Full lockdep splat: > > > > > > [12301.898799] ============================================ > > > [12301.898805] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected > > > [12301.898811] 4.20.0-rc7+ #84 Not tainted > > > [12301.898815] -------------------------------------------- > > > [12301.898821] bash/5297 is trying to acquire lock: > > > [12301.898826] 00000000f61c6093 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 > > > [12301.898841] but task is already holding lock: > > > [12301.898847] 000000005f634021 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190 > > > [12301.898856] other info that might help us debug this: > > > [12301.898862] Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > > [12301.898867] CPU0 > > > [12301.898870] ---- > > > [12301.898874] lock(kn->count#39); > > > [12301.898879] lock(kn->count#39); > > > [12301.898883] *** DEADLOCK *** > > > [12301.898891] May be due to missing lock nesting notation > > > [12301.898899] 5 locks held by bash/5297: > > > [12301.898903] #0: 00000000cd800e54 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x17f/0x1b0 > > > [12301.898915] #1: 000000000465e7c2 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xd3/0x190 > > > [12301.898925] #2: 000000005f634021 (kn->count#39){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0xdc/0x190 > > > [12301.898936] #3: 00000000414ef7ac (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x34/0x240 > > > [12301.898950] #4: 000000003218fbdf (register_count_mutex){+.+.}, at: acpi_video_unregister+0xe/0x40 > > > [12301.898960] stack backtrace: > > > [12301.898968] CPU: 1 PID: 5297 Comm: bash Not tainted 4.20.0-rc7+ #84 > > > [12301.898974] Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP EliteBook 8460p/161C, BIOS 68SCF Ver. F.01 03/11/2011 > > > [12301.898982] Call Trace: > > > [12301.898989] dump_stack+0x67/0x9b > > > [12301.898997] __lock_acquire+0x6ad/0x1410 > > > [12301.899003] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 > > > [12301.899010] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 > > > [12301.899017] ? mutex_spin_on_owner+0xe4/0x150 > > > [12301.899023] ? find_held_lock+0x2d/0x90 > > > [12301.899030] ? lock_acquire+0x90/0x180 > > > [12301.899036] lock_acquire+0x90/0x180 > > > [12301.899042] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 > > > [12301.899049] __kernfs_remove+0x296/0x310 > > > [12301.899055] ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 > > > [12301.899060] ? kernfs_name_hash+0xd/0x80 > > > [12301.899066] ? kernfs_find_ns+0x6c/0x100 > > > [12301.899073] kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0x3b/0x80 > > > [12301.899080] bus_remove_driver+0x92/0xa0 > > > [12301.899085] acpi_video_unregister+0x24/0x40 > > > [12301.899127] i915_driver_unload+0x42/0x130 [i915] > > > [12301.899160] i915_pci_remove+0x19/0x30 [i915] > > > [12301.899169] pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0 > > > [12301.899176] device_release_driver_internal+0x185/0x240 > > > [12301.899183] unbind_store+0xaf/0x180 > > > [12301.899189] kernfs_fop_write+0x104/0x190 > > > [12301.899195] __vfs_write+0x31/0x180 > > > [12301.899203] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80 > > > [12301.899209] ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x29/0x50 > > > [12301.899216] ? __sb_start_write+0x13c/0x1a0 > > > [12301.899221] ? vfs_write+0x17f/0x1b0 > > > [12301.899227] vfs_write+0xb9/0x1b0 > > > [12301.899233] ksys_write+0x50/0xc0 > > > [12301.899239] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x180 > > > [12301.899247] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe > > > [12301.899253] RIP: 0033:0x7f452ac7f7a4 > > > [12301.899259] Code: 00 f7 d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 8b 05 aa f0 2c 00 48 63 ff 85 c0 75 13 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 54 f3 c3 66 90 55 53 48 89 d5 48 89 f3 48 83 > > > [12301.899273] RSP: 002b:00007ffceafa6918 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001 > > > [12301.899282] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000000000d RCX: 00007f452ac7f7a4 > > > [12301.899288] RDX: 000000000000000d RSI: 00005612a1abf7c0 RDI: 0000000000000001 > > > [12301.899295] RBP: 00005612a1abf7c0 R08: 000000000000000a R09: 00005612a1c46730 > > > [12301.899301] R10: 000000000000000a R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000000000d > > > [12301.899308] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f452af4a740 R15: 000000000000000d > > > > > > Locking around I've noticed that usb and i2c already handle similar > > > recursion problems, where a sysfs file can unbind the same type of > > > sysfs somewhere else in the hierarchy. Relevant commits are: > > > > > > commit 356c05d58af05d582e634b54b40050c73609617b > > > Author: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Date: Mon May 14 13:30:03 2012 -0400 > > > > > > sysfs: get rid of some lockdep false positives > > > > > > commit e9b526fe704812364bca07edd15eadeba163ebfb > > > Author: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@xxxxxxx> > > > Date: Fri May 17 14:56:35 2013 +0200 > > > > > > i2c: suppress lockdep warning on delete_device > > > > > > Implement the same trick for driver bind/unbind. > > > > > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Arend van Spriel <aspriel@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/base/bus.c | 4 ++-- > > > include/linux/device.h | 4 ++++ > > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/bus.c b/drivers/base/bus.c > > > index 8bfd27ec73d6..5d2411b848cd 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/base/bus.c > > > +++ b/drivers/base/bus.c > > > @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static ssize_t unbind_store(struct device_driver *drv, const char *buf, > > > bus_put(bus); > > > return err; > > > } > > > -static DRIVER_ATTR_WO(unbind); > > > +static DRIVER_ATTR_IGNORE_LOCKDEP(unbind, S_IWUSR, NULL, unbind_store); > > > > > > /* > > > * Manually attach a device to a driver. > > > @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static ssize_t bind_store(struct device_driver *drv, const char *buf, > > > bus_put(bus); > > > return err; > > > } > > > -static DRIVER_ATTR_WO(bind); > > > +static DRIVER_ATTR_IGNORE_LOCKDEP(bind, S_IWUSR, NULL, bind_store); > > > > > > static ssize_t show_drivers_autoprobe(struct bus_type *bus, char *buf) > > > { > > > diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h > > > index 1b25c7a43f4c..d2cb1a6c5d95 100644 > > > --- a/include/linux/device.h > > > +++ b/include/linux/device.h > > > @@ -326,6 +326,10 @@ struct driver_attribute { > > > struct driver_attribute driver_attr_##_name = __ATTR_RO(_name) > > > #define DRIVER_ATTR_WO(_name) \ > > > struct driver_attribute driver_attr_##_name = __ATTR_WO(_name) > > > +#define DRIVER_ATTR_IGNORE_LOCKDEP(_name, _mode, _show, _store) \ > > > + struct driver_attribute driver_attr_##_name = \ > > > + __ATTR_IGNORE_LOCKDEP(_name, _mode, _show, _store) > > > + > > > > I don't want to give driver writers the ability to shoot themselves in > > the foot, can you just put this in the bus.c file itself so that no one > > else will abuse this and "open code" the unbind/bind attributes instead > > of using a #define for it? > > Good point, but any attribute starting a driver unbind via sysfs will > need this, won't it? And how many of those are there? :) > > Also I've been trying to get rid of the "specify the mode" macros, so > > that everyone uses the RO, WO, and RW versions, so adding a generic one > > here is not going to help with that effort :) > > But if that goes into bus.c directly, the mode arg doesn't hurt IMO > and one macro would be sufficient to cover both attrs. One macro in bus.c is fine, just don't put it in device.h. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
