On Tue, 11 Dec 2018 at 22:15, François Tigeot <ftigeot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * There is no way to check if a device name is really a drm device > by looking it up in a virtual filesystem like on Linux > > * The major device number is also dynamically allocated from a pool, > comparing it to a constant makes no sense > > * In the absence of better ideas, just assume the device name really > points to a drm device and always return true > I guess one could use the sysfs path, although that may require a few extra lines to the linux emulation layer. What's the reason behind the dynamic allocation of the major? FWIW some userspace requires a fixed DRM_MAJOR - they will need patching to run :-( Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
