Hi, On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:31 AM Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add the nodes to describe the Adreno GPU and GMU devices. > > Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 123 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi > index c27cbd3bcb0a..daa404b05a70 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845.dtsi > @@ -7,9 +7,11 @@ > > #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sdm845.h> > #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdm845.h> > +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gpucc-sdm845.h> Probably don't need to add this in your patch since (presumably) your patch needs to be based atop <https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1018365/> and that already adds the #include (and also the node that you depend on). > #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h> > #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > #include <dt-bindings/phy/phy-qcom-qusb2.h> > +#include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h> > #include <dt-bindings/reset/qcom,sdm845-aoss.h> > #include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,rpmh-rsc.h> > #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sdm845.h> > @@ -1348,6 +1350,127 @@ > }; > }; > > + gpu@5000000 { > + compatible = "qcom,adreno-630.2", "qcom,adreno"; > + #stream-id-cells = <16>; > + > + reg = <0x5000000 0x40000>, <0x509e000 0x10>; > + reg-names = "kgsl_3d0_reg_memory", "cx_mem"; The second register range isn't in your bindings patch. Can you add it? > + /* > + * Look ma, no clocks! The GPU clocks and power are > + * controlled entirely by the GMU > + */ > + > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 300 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + interrupt-names = "kgsl_3d0_irq"; > + > + iommus = <&adreno_smmu 0>; It it worth mentioning the iommus and #stream-id-cells in the bindings? > + operating-points-v2 = <&gpu_opp_table>; Is it worth mentioning the operating-points-v2 in the bindings patch? > + > + qcom,gmu = <&gmu>; > + > + gpu_opp_table: adreno-opp-table { nit: since this is no longer at the top level you can just call it "opp-table" now. That matches what the latest RPMh PD node looks like. > + compatible = "operating-points-v2-qcom-level"; > + > + opp-710000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <710000000>; > + qcom,level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_TURBO_L1>; > + }; > + > + opp-675000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <675000000>; > + qcom,level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_TURBO>; > + }; > + > + opp-596000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <596000000>; > + qcom,level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_NOM_L1>; > + }; > + > + opp-520000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <520000000>; > + qcom,level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_NOM>; > + }; > + > + opp-414000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <414000000>; > + qcom,level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_SVS_L1>; > + }; > + > + opp-342000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <342000000>; > + qcom,level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_SVS>; > + }; > + > + opp-257000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <257000000>; > + qcom,level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_LOW_SVS>; > + }; > + }; > + }; > + > + adreno_smmu: iommu@5040000 { > + compatible = "qcom,sdm845-smmu-v2", "qcom,smmu-v2"; > + reg = <0x5040000 0x10000>; > + #iommu-cells = <1>; > + #global-interrupts = <2>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 229 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > + <GIC_SPI 231 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > + <GIC_SPI 364 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, > + <GIC_SPI 365 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, > + <GIC_SPI 366 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, > + <GIC_SPI 367 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, > + <GIC_SPI 368 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, > + <GIC_SPI 369 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, > + <GIC_SPI 370 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>, > + <GIC_SPI 371 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>; > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_GPU_MEMNOC_GFX_CLK>, > + <&gcc GCC_GPU_CFG_AHB_CLK>; > + clock-names = "bus", "iface"; > + > + power-domains = <&gpucc GPU_CX_GDSC>; > + }; > + > + gmu: gmu@506a000 { > + compatible="qcom,adreno-gmu"; > + > + reg = <0x506a000 0x30000>, > + <0xb280000 0x10000>, > + <0xb480000 0x10000>; > + reg-names = "gmu", "gmu_pdc", "gmu_pdc_seq"; > + > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 304 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>, > + <GIC_SPI 305 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + interrupt-names = "hfi", "gmu"; > + > + clocks = <&gpucc GPU_CC_CX_GMU_CLK>, > + <&gpucc GPU_CC_CXO_CLK>, > + <&gcc GCC_DDRSS_GPU_AXI_CLK>, > + <&gcc GCC_GPU_MEMNOC_GFX_CLK>; > + clock-names = "gmu", "cxo", "axi", "memnoc"; > + > + power-domains = <&gpucc GPU_CX_GDSC>; > + iommus = <&adreno_smmu 5>; > + > + operating-points-v2 = <&gmu_opp_table>; > + > + gmu_opp_table: adreno-gmu-opp-table { Same here that this can just be called "opp-table". > + compatible = "operating-points-v2-qcom-level"; > + > + opp-400000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <400000000>; > + qcom,level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_SVS>; > + }; > + > + opp-200000000 { > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <200000000>; > + qcom,level = <RPMH_REGULATOR_LEVEL_MIN_SVS>; > + }; > + }; > + }; > + > usb_1_hsphy: phy@88e2000 { Since you won't compile without the gpucc patch maybe pick it before sending out your patch? Then context diff would show gpucc right here and it will avoid merge conflicts. -Doug _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
