----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Simmons" <jsimmons@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "dri-devel" <dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Thursday, 15 March, 2012 3:18:14 PM > Subject: Re: drm-core-next vs drm-next > > > > as a headsup, if you are basing a tree on mine, please use > > drm-core-next not drm-next itself as a basis for your tree. > > > > At the moment they've diverged as I've put the UDL kms driver into > > drm-next but not drm-core-next as it needs an external fbdev patch > > to > > work. > > Is this temporary? Well its the way things are supposed to work, but I realise I haven't mentioned that in a while. drm-core-next isn't going to be rebased, but drm-next sometimes has to get a bit messy just to ensure upstream -next can build. Dave. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
