On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:41 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 03:34:56PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > > > +int vm_insert_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, > > > + struct page **pages, unsigned long page_count) > > > +{ > > > + unsigned long uaddr = addr; > > > + int ret = 0, i; > > > > Some of the sites being replaced were effectively ensuring that vma and > > pages were mutually compatible as an initial condition - would it be worth > > adding something here for robustness, e.g.: > > > > + if (page_count != vma_pages(vma)) > > + return -ENXIO; > > I think we want to allow this to be used to populate part of a VMA. > So perhaps: > > if (page_count > vma_pages(vma)) > return -ENXIO; Ok, This can be added. I think Patch [2/9] is the only leftover place where this check could be removed. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel