On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 14:45 -0800, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 12:59 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 18:25 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > > According to eDP spec, sink can required specific selective
> > > update
> > > granularity that source must comply.
> > > Here caching the value if required and checking if source
> > > supports
> > > it.
> > >
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > index 43ac6873a2bb..0727d8051dd3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > > @@ -507,6 +507,7 @@ struct i915_psr {
> > > ktime_t last_exit;
> > > bool sink_not_reliable;
> > > bool irq_aux_error;
> > > + u16 su_x_granularity;
> > > };
> > >
> > > enum intel_pch {
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > index 282ff1bc68a7..f9eccaac850a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
> > > @@ -261,6 +261,23 @@ static u8
> > > intel_dp_get_sink_sync_latency(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > return val;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static u16 intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > > +{
> > > + u16 val;
> > > + ssize_t r;
> > > +
> > > + if (!(intel_dp->psr_dpcd[1] & DP_PSR2_SU_GRANULARITY_REQUIRED))
> > > {
> > > + /* Returning the default X granularity */
> > > + return 4;
> > > + }
> >
> > nit: Braces not needed, you could move the comment a line above.
> >
> > A value of 0 in this DPCD indicates there is no granularity
> > requirement, why assume 4?
>
> Like you said bellow, 4 is the default granularity if this is not
> set.
>
The spec states 0 means no granularity requirements, return 1 here?
> >
> > > +
> > > + r = drm_dp_dpcd_read(&intel_dp->aux, DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY,
> > > &val, 2);
> > > + if (r != 2)
> > > + DRM_WARN("Unable to read DP_PSR2_SU_X_GRANULARITY\n");
> >
> > Please change this to the warning level that we use elsewhere for
> > aux
> > failures.
>
> So changing to DRM_DEBUG_KMS()
>
> >
> > If I'm reading the spec correctly, a value of 0 in this DPCD means
> > the
> > sink expects a granularity of 4, so returning 0 would be incorrect.
> >
> > > +
> > > + return val;
> >
> > Assume the default value of 4 if aux read fails (after printing an
> > error)
> >
>
> Done
>
>
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> > > @@ -315,6 +332,8 @@ void intel_psr_init_dpcd(struct intel_dp
> > > *intel_dp)
> > > if (dev_priv->psr.sink_psr2_support) {
> > > dev_priv->psr.colorimetry_support =
> > > intel_dp_get_colorimetry_status(intel_d
> > > p);
> > > + dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity =
> > > + intel_dp_get_su_x_granulartiy(intel_dp)
> > > ;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > }
> > > @@ -546,7 +565,7 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct
> > > intel_dp *intel_dp,
> > > * at each 4 lines with height of 4 lines, what eDP states
> > > * that sink should support.
> > > */
> > > - if (crtc_hdisplay % 4) {
> > > + if (crtc_hdisplay % dev_priv->psr.su_x_granularity) {
> > > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, default SU granularity
> > > not match\n");
> > > return false;
> > > }
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
