Hi,
On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 11:04 +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:56:58 +0100
> Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c
> > index 7195a0bcceb3..0ee75c71d8d8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c
> > @@ -46,6 +46,56 @@
> > #define DRIVER_MINOR 0
> > #define DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL 0
> >
> > +static int vc4_debugfs_load_tracker_get(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_device *dev = m->private;
> > + struct vc4_dev *vc4 = to_vc4_dev(dev);
> > +
> > + if (vc4->load_tracker_enabled)
> > + seq_printf(m, "enabled\n");
> > + else
> > + seq_printf(m, "disabled\n");
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t vc4_debugfs_load_tracker_set(struct file *file,
> > + const char __user *ubuf,
> > + size_t len, loff_t *offp)
> > +{
> > + struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
> > + struct drm_device *dev = m->private;
> > + struct vc4_dev *vc4 = to_vc4_dev(dev);
> > + char buf[32] = {};
> > +
> > + if (len >= sizeof(buf))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (copy_from_user(buf, ubuf, len))
> > + return -EFAULT;
> > +
> > + if (!strncasecmp(buf, "enable", 6))
> > + vc4->load_tracker_enabled = true;
> > + else if (!strncasecmp(buf, "disable", 7))
> > + vc4->load_tracker_enabled = false;
> > + else
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vc4_debugfs_load_tracker_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > +{
> > + return single_open(file, vc4_debugfs_load_tracker_get, inode->i_private);
> > +}
> > +
> > +const struct file_operations vc4_debugfs_load_tracker_fops = {
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > + .open = vc4_debugfs_load_tracker_open,
> > + .read = seq_read,
> > + .write = vc4_debugfs_load_tracker_set,
> > +};
> > +
>
> I'd put this code directly in vc4_debugfs.c so you can make
> vc4_debugfs_load_tracker_fops static and you don't need the extern ...
> definition in vc4_drv.h. But maybe you have a good reason to do that.
You're right, it would be better that way. There is indeed no particular
constraint for having this in vc4_drv.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Kocialkowski, Bootlin (formerly Free Electrons)
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
