Comment # 5
on bug 108891
from Casey Bowman
(In reply to Chris Wilson from comment #4) > Just a very misleading bisect. Agreed, the commit found would probably just cause the gem -hang tests to fail in the kernel we're using as you mentioned earlier. However, for the cases in which a basic subtest is run (for example, igt@gem_busy@basic-busy-default or igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-cpu) there shouldn't be any hang checks (igt_allow_hang) for the requirements of those subtests, right? If so, should we change the bug title to reflect that some requirement checks are being run on subtests that don't reflect the subtest names, like how igt@gem_busy@basic-busy-default doesn't have 'hang' in it?
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
