Re: [PATCH 1/3] qxl: No need for NULL check before calling qxl_bo_unref()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] qxl: No need for NULL check before calling qxl_bo_unref()
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 09:14:12 +0100
Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20181120162004.22807-1-cfergeau@redhat.com>
References: <20181120162004.22807-1-cfergeau@redhat.com>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20180716

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 05:20:02PM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> qxl_bo_unref() is already performing a NULL check.

All queued up for -next.

thanks,
  Gerd

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

References:
- [PATCH 1/3] qxl: No need for NULL check before calling qxl_bo_unref()
  - From: Christophe Fergeau

Prev by Date: [Bug 201439] Amdgpu: system freeze when waking up from monitor blanking
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -next] drm/cirrus: Remove set but not used variable 'bo'
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/3] qxl: Remove unused qxl_bo_pin arguments
Next by thread: [PATCH 1/4] drm/edid: Add CTA-861-G modes with VIC < 128
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux DRI Users] [Linux Intel Graphics] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux