Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/i915/intel_i2c: cleanup gmbus/gpio pin assignments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed,  7 Mar 2012 19:50:45 +0800, Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> There is no "disabled" port 0.  So, don't even try to initialize/scan
>> it, etc.  This saves a bit of time when initializing the driver, since
>> the we can avoid a 50ms timeout waiting for a device to respond on
>> a port that doesn't even exist.
>>
>> Similarly, don't initialize the reserved port, either.
>
>> @@ -150,32 +164,23 @@ static void set_data(void *data, int state_high)
>>  static struct i2c_adapter *
>>  intel_gpio_create(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 pin)
>>  {
>> -     static const int map_pin_to_reg[] = {
>> -             0,
>> -             GPIOB,
>> -             GPIOA,
>> -             GPIOC,
>> -             GPIOD,
>> -             GPIOE,
>> -             GPIOF,
>> -             0,
>> -     };
>>       struct intel_gpio *gpio;
>>
>> -     if (pin >= ARRAY_SIZE(map_pin_to_reg) || !map_pin_to_reg[pin])
>
> And that doesn't do what your changelog proposes? Why?

This changelog proposes to optimize initialization of the gmbus ports,
not the gpio-bit-bang ports.

> -Chris
>
> --
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux