On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:43:51AM -0800, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: > On 2018-11-14 07:16, Sean Paul wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 04:48:12PM -0800, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote: > > > On 2018-11-13 12:52, Sean Paul wrote: > > > > From: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Instead of assigning/clearing the crtc on vblank enable/disable, we > > can > > > > just assign and clear the crtc on modeset. That allows us to just > > toggle > > > > the encoder's vblank interrupts on vblank_enable. > > > > > > > > So why is this important? Previously the driver was using the legacy > > > > pointers to assign/clear the crtc. Legacy pointers are cleared _after_ > > > Which pointers are you referring here as legacy pointers? CRTC? > > > > encoder->crtc in this case. The loop in vblank_enable_no_lock relies on > > enc->crtc == crtc > > > > > > disabling the hardware, so the legacy pointer was valid during > > > > vblank_disable, but that's not something we should rely on. > > > > > > > > Instead of relying on the core ordering the legacy pointer assignments > > > > just so, we'll assign the crtc in dpu_crtc enable/disable. This is the > > > > only place that mapping can change, so we're covered there. > > > > > > > > We're also taking advantage of drm_crtc_vblank_on/off. By using this, > > we > > > > ensure that vblank_enable/disable can never be called while the crtc > > is > > > > off (which means the assigned crtc will always be valid). As such, we > > > > > > What about the drm_vblank_enable/disable triggered by drm_vblank_get > > when > > > crtc > > > is disabled? What is the expected behavior there? the vblank_requested > > > variable removed by the next patch was introduced to cache the > > > request. > > > > That case is covered by the modeset locks held when calling disable(). > > > I am sure it will take care of drm_crtc_vblank_on/off triggered within > crtc_disable. > My question was what was the expected behaviour when DRM_IOCTL_WAIT_VBLANK > is > called when crtc is disabled? the ioctl will try to call drm_vblank_get and > I > don't see the patch checking for crtc being enabled in the path. It's the same as any other drm_vblank_get call when the crtc is disabled, it's gated internally by the core when vblank is turned off. > > Thanks and Regards, > Jeykumar S. > > > > > > > > > don't need to use modeset locks or the crtc_lock in the > > > > vblank_enable/disable routine to be sure state is consistent. > > > > > > > > ...I think. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_crtc.c | 77 > > +++++++++------------ > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 27 +++++--- > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.h | 10 +++ > > > > 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) > > > > /snip > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c > > > > index fd6514f681ae..5914ae70572c 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c > > > > @@ -1267,22 +1267,29 @@ void dpu_encoder_assign_crtc(struct > > drm_encoder > > > > *drm_enc, struct drm_crtc *crtc) > > > > { > > > > struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc = to_dpu_encoder_virt(drm_enc); > > > > unsigned long lock_flags; > > > > - bool enable; > > > > - int i; > > > > - > > > > - enable = crtc ? true : false; > > > > - > > > > - if (!drm_enc) { > > > > - DPU_ERROR("invalid encoder\n"); > > > > - return; > > > > - } > > > > - trace_dpu_enc_vblank_cb(DRMID(drm_enc), enable); > > > > > > > > spin_lock_irqsave(&dpu_enc->enc_spinlock, lock_flags); > > > > /* crtc should always be cleared before re-assigning */ > > > > WARN_ON(crtc && dpu_enc->crtc); > > > > dpu_enc->crtc = crtc; > > > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dpu_enc->enc_spinlock, lock_flags); > > > > +} > > > > + > > > > +void dpu_encoder_toggle_vblank_for_crtc(struct drm_encoder *drm_enc, > > > > + struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool > > > > enable) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc = to_dpu_encoder_virt(drm_enc); > > > > + unsigned long lock_flags; > > > > + int i; > > > > + > > > > + trace_dpu_enc_vblank_cb(DRMID(drm_enc), enable); > > > > + > > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dpu_enc->enc_spinlock, lock_flags); > > > > + if (dpu_enc->crtc == crtc) { > > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dpu_enc->enc_spinlock, > > > > lock_flags); > > > > + return; > > > > + } > > > Why are you returning when the crtc's are same? > > > Won't they be same all the time between modesets? > > > Ugh, well that's embarrassing! This is supposed to be != > > > for both enable/disable crtc will be the same and you still need to > > > call > > the > > > for loop below to enable/disable the phys encoders. > > > > > Can you go through my comments above? Shoot, sorry, I didn't see these. Sean > > > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dpu_enc->enc_spinlock, lock_flags); > > > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < dpu_enc->num_phys_encs; i++) { > > > > struct dpu_encoder_phys *phys = dpu_enc->phys_encs[i]; > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.h > > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.h > > > > index be1d80867834..6896ea2ab854 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.h > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.h > > > > @@ -62,6 +62,16 @@ void dpu_encoder_get_hw_resources(struct > > drm_encoder > > > > *encoder, > > > > void dpu_encoder_assign_crtc(struct drm_encoder *encoder, > > > > struct drm_crtc *crtc); > > > > > > > > +/** > > > > + * dpu_encoder_toggle_vblank_for_crtc - Toggles vblank interrupts on > > or > > > > off if > > > > + * the encoder is assigned to the given crtc > > > > + * @encoder: encoder pointer > > > > + * @crtc: crtc pointer > > > > + * @enable: true if vblank should be enabled > > > > + */ > > > > +void dpu_encoder_toggle_vblank_for_crtc(struct drm_encoder *encoder, > > > > + struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool > > > > enable); > > > > + > > > > /** > > > > * dpu_encoder_register_frame_event_callback - provide callback to > > > > encoder that > > > > * will be called after the request is complete, or other events. > > > > > > -- > > > Jeykumar S > > -- > Jeykumar S -- Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel