On Tue, 06 Nov 2018, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 09:48:33 +0100 > Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> A problem was found when EDID data sets for displays other >> than the provided samples were generated. The patch series has >> no effect on the provided samples that still match the data >> used in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid_load.c. >> The provided samples use small values for XOFFSET, XPULSE, >> YOFFSET and YPULSE, where the error doesn't occur. This fix >> corrects the use of that values in case of high values, because >> the most significant bits were treated incorrectly. >> >> The previous version made it necessary to first generate an >> EDID data set without correct CRC and then to fix the CRC in >> a second step. This patch series adds the CRC calculation to the >> makefile in such a way that a correct EDID data set is generated >> in a single build step. > > This seems reasonable, I guess; I've applied both. It seems to me, though, > that this stuff is in the wrong place. Perhaps we should go one step > further and move it to tools/ ? And then the next step further would be to write a tool in a high level language to generate the data rather than assemble the binary. Such a tool would, of course, catch errors like the ones fixed by this patch. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
