Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2018 12:05:03 +0200
> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The source image might be only vertically scaled, and in this case
>> ->is_unity will be false, but we'd still have to force ->x_scaling[0]
>> to VC4_SCALING_PPF for YUV conversion to work properly.
>>
>> Let's replace the ->is_unity test by->x_scaling[0] == VC4_SCALING_NONE
>> to cope with that.
>>
>> Fixes: 658d8cbd07da ("drm/vc4: Fix the "no scaling" case on multi-planar YUV formats")
>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
>> index 60d5ad19cedd..32b7b9f47c5d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_plane.c
>> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int vc4_plane_setup_clipping_and_scaling(struct drm_plane_state *state)
>> * even on a plane that's otherwise 1:1. Looks like only PPF
>> * works in that case, so let's pick that one.
>> */
>> - if (vc4_state->is_unity)
>> + if (vc4_state->x_scaling[0] == VC4_SCALING_NONE)
>> vc4_state->x_scaling[0] = VC4_SCALING_PPF;
>
> Actually, I'm not sure about this patch is needed. According to the
> spec, we should not enable the scaler on the Y channel when ->is_unity
> is true.
> I tested it, and it seems to work if we just leave x_scaling[0] to
> VC4_SCALING_NONE.
Sorry, I've been delaying on this series until I could spend some time
looking at the spec.
I think you're right, I see no reason to kick us out of is_unity for
YUV -- you can have is_unity, Y unscaled, and UV scaled.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
