Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/virtio: add uapi for in and out explicit fences

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2018-10-31 10:38, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Rob,

On Thu, 25 Oct 2018 at 19:38, Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Add a new field called fence_fd that will be used by userspace to send
in-fences to the kernel and receive out-fences created by the kernel.

This uapi enables virtio to take advantage of explicit synchronization of
dma-bufs.

There are two new flags:

* VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_IN to be used when passing an in-fence fd.
* VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FENCE_FD_OUT to be used when requesting an out-fence fd

The execbuffer IOCTL is now read-write to allow the userspace to read the
out-fence.

On error -1 should be returned in the fence_fd field.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v2:
  - Since exbuf-flags is a new flag, check that unsupported
    flags aren't set.

  drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c |  5 +++++
  include/uapi/drm/virtgpu_drm.h         | 13 ++++++++++---
  2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
index d01a9ed100d1..1af289b28fc4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ioctl.c
@@ -116,9 +116,14 @@ static int virtio_gpu_execbuffer_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
         struct ww_acquire_ctx ticket;
         void *buf;

+       exbuf->fence_fd = -1;
+
Move this after the sanity checking.

Agreed. Fixed in v4


         if (vgdev->has_virgl_3d == false)
                 return -ENOSYS;

+       if ((exbuf->flags & ~VIRTGPU_EXECBUF_FLAGS))
+               return -EINVAL;
+
I assume this did this trigger when using old userspace?

No, not as far as I'm aware. This check is there to prevent userspace from
polluting the bitspace of flag, so that all free bits can be used for new flags.

As far as I understand this is pointed out by a drm driver development document
written by danvet, which I unfortunately can't seem to find the link for at the
moment.


With those the patch is
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
Emil

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux