On 10/31, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:13 PM Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 31 Oct 2018, Shayenne da Luz Moura <shayenneluzmoura@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Add a new variable to make the drm_mode_object comparison before
> > > idr_alloc and decrease line size.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shayenne da Luz Moura <shayenneluzmoura@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> > > index be8b754eaf60..4b9eafddb409 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c
> > > @@ -36,9 +36,10 @@ int __drm_mode_object_add(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_mode_object *obj,
> > > void (*obj_free_cb)(struct kref *kref))
> > > {
> > > int ret;
> > > + struct drm_mode_object *obj_tmp = register_obj ? obj : NULL;
> > >
> > > mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.idr_mutex);
> > > - ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr, register_obj ? obj : NULL, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + ret = idr_alloc(&dev->mode_config.crtc_idr, obj_tmp, 1, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > Please don't send checkpatch "fixes" to adhere to the 80-column rule. Or
> > at least use --max-line-length=100 or something to look for worse
> > offenders than this.
> >
> > And if you insist, please just add a newline and proper indentation
> > after "NULL," instead of adding a temporary variable.
>
> Breaking the line after NULL, seems reasonable, I'd be happy to merge that.
> -Daniel
Okay, I will send a new version.
Thank you!
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
