Bug ID | 108609 |
---|---|
Summary | vegam_smumgr.c: accessing mvdd_voltage_table.entries[] array out of bounds in function vegam_populate_smc_mvdd_table |
Product | DRI |
Version | unspecified |
Hardware | x86-64 (AMD64) |
OS | Linux (All) |
Status | NEW |
Severity | normal |
Priority | medium |
Component | DRM/AMDgpu |
Assignee | dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org |
Reporter | rstrube@gmail.com |
Created attachment 142298 [details] [review] Patch to fix accessing mvdd_voltage_table.entries[] array out of bounds in vegam_smumgr.c I believe I've discovered a small bug in the vegam_smumgr.c, specifically the following function: static int vegam_populate_smc_mvdd_table(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr, SMU75_Discrete_DpmTable *table) { struct smu7_hwmgr *data = "" smu7_hwmgr *)(hwmgr->backend); uint32_t count, level; if (SMU7_VOLTAGE_CONTROL_BY_GPIO == data->mvdd_control) { count = data->mvdd_voltage_table.count; if (count > SMU_MAX_SMIO_LEVELS) count = SMU_MAX_SMIO_LEVELS; for (level = 0; level < count; level++) { table->SmioTable2.Pattern[level].Voltage = PP_HOST_TO_SMC_US( data->mvdd_voltage_table.entries[count].value * VOLTAGE_SCALE); /* Index into DpmTable.Smio. Drive bits from Smio entry to get this voltage level.*/ table->SmioTable2.Pattern[level].Smio = (uint8_t) level; table->Smio[level] |= data->mvdd_voltage_table.entries[level].smio_low; } table->SmioMask2 = data->mvdd_voltage_table.mask_low; table->MvddLevelCount = (uint32_t) PP_HOST_TO_SMC_UL(count); } return 0; } With the lines (within the for loop): table->SmioTable2.Pattern[level].Voltage = PP_HOST_TO_SMC_US( data->mvdd_voltage_table.entries[count].value * VOLTAGE_SCALE); If this code was executed it would try to access the mvdd_voltage_table.entries[] array out of bounds, because count > than the max value for level. I believe: data->mvdd_voltage_table.entries[count].value should actually be: data->mvdd_voltage_table.entries[level].value You can see in a similar function within vegam_smumgr.c, this bug is *not* present: static int vegam_populate_smc_vddci_table(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr, struct SMU75_Discrete_DpmTable *table) { uint32_t count, level; struct smu7_hwmgr *data = "" smu7_hwmgr *)(hwmgr->backend); count = data->vddci_voltage_table.count; if (SMU7_VOLTAGE_CONTROL_BY_GPIO == data->vddci_control) { if (count > SMU_MAX_SMIO_LEVELS) count = SMU_MAX_SMIO_LEVELS; for (level = 0; level < count; ++level) { table->SmioTable1.Pattern[level].Voltage = PP_HOST_TO_SMC_US( data->vddci_voltage_table.entries[level].value * VOLTAGE_SCALE); table->SmioTable1.Pattern[level].Smio = (uint8_t) level; table->Smio[level] |= data->vddci_voltage_table.entries[level].smio_low; } } table->SmioMask1 = data->vddci_voltage_table.mask_low; return 0; } I've attached a patch for kernel 4.19, admittedly the change is trivial but I figured I would try to do things the right way :) Thanks! Rob
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel