On 10/22, Emil Velikov wrote: > Hi all, Hi Emil, Thanks for your feedback. > On Tue, 22 May 2018 at 02:07, Rodrigo Siqueira > <rodrigosiqueiramelo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > This > > > +/* > > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by > > + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or > > + * (at your option) any later version. > > + */ > > and this are not the same thing. > > The former is 2.0-only, while the explicit text is 2.0-or-later. > > Personally, I'd opt for 2.0-only, or even make it a dual 2.0-only OR MIT. > Yet again, this is not my code, so not my decision to make. I have to admit that I do not understand too much about these issues, however, now it is time to for learning more about it :) Do you have any documentation to recommend me about the issue? I want to read it, and fix the problems that you highlighted. Best Regards > From a quick glance other vkms files have the same mismatch. > > HTH > Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
