Am 17.10.18 um 11:17 schrieb zhoucm1:
> [SNIP]
>>> +struct drm_syncobj_signal_pt {
>>> + struct dma_fence_array *base;
>> Out of curiosity, why the pointer and not embedding? base is kinda
>> misleading for a pointer.
> Yeah, Christian doesn't like signal_pt lifecycle same as fence, so
> it's a pointer.
> If you don't like 'base' name, I can change it.
Well I never said that you can't embed the fence array into the signal_pt.
You just need to make sure that we don't affect the drm_syncobj
lilecycle as well, e.g. that we don't also need to keep that around.
Regards,
Christian.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
