Re: [PATCH] [i915] Fix another use of the wrong interlace mask to return to progressive mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:51:42AM +0100, Christian Schmidt wrote:
> intel_display.c:            pipeconf |= PIPECONF_INTERLACE_W_FIELD_INDICATION;
> intel_display.c:            pipeconf &= ~PIPECONF_INTERLACE_MASK; /* progressive */
> intel_display.c:            pipeconf |= PIPECONF_INTERLACE_W_FIELD_INDICATION;
> intel_display.c:            pipeconf &= ~PIPECONF_INTERLACE_W_FIELD_INDICATION; /* progressive */
> 
> The second setting of progressive mode should use PIPECONF_INTERLACE_MASK, too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Schmidt <schmidt@xxxxxxxxx>

Already fixed in -fixes. Furthermore we have (hopefully) fully working
interlaced support merged into -next (already pushed out to Dave's
drm-next tree).
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@xxxxxxxx
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux