On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:10:31PM +0800, Chunming Zhou wrote: > flags is new param for drm_syncob_find_fence, so need update doc, reproduce: make htmldocs > > reported: > htmldocs: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c:230: warning: Function parameter or member 'flags' not described in 'drm_syncobj_find_fence' > > Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c > index aed492570d85..b978de24f33a 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c > @@ -434,10 +434,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_syncobj_search_fence); > * @file_private: drm file private pointer > * @handle: sync object handle to lookup. > * @point: timeline point > + * @flags: DRM_SYNCOBJ_WAIT_FLAGS_WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT or not > * @fence: out parameter for the fence > * > * This is just a convenience function that combines drm_syncobj_find() and > - * drm_syncobj_lookup_fence(). > + * drm_syncobj_search_fence(). This part isn't needed yet in upstream. Can you pls resend with the patch rebased on top of drm-misc-next? Thanks, Daniel > * > * Returns 0 on success or a negative error value on failure. On success @fence > * contains a reference to the fence, which must be released by calling > -- > 2.17.1 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel