Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > You can make the monotonic case the same as the raw case if you make > sure to always sample the CPU first by e.g. splitting the loops into > two and doing CPU in the first and GPU in the second. That way you > make the case above impossible. Right, I had thought of that, and it probably solves the problem for us. If more time domains are added, things become 'more complicated' though. > That said "start of the interval of the tick" is kinda arbitrary and > you could pick random other points on that interval, so depending on > what requirements you put on it (i.e. can the chosen position be > different per call, consistent but implicit or explicitly picked which > might be leaked through the interface) the max deviation changes. So > depending on interpretation this thing can be very moot ... It doesn't really matter what phase you use; the timer increments periodically, and what really matters is the time when that happens relative to other clocks changing. -- -keith
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
