On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Perhaps a stupid question, but does you tree has > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux/commit/?h=drm-next&id=9292f37e1f5c79400254dca46f83313488093825 > from Dave's drm-next? > > If it has, it would be the 1st time that I see xrandr take longer than .5s > with that patch on an Intel GPU. We even added a check for this into > intel-gpu-tools to warn us if any machine takes that long, and none had hit > it so far. So if this is the case here, there is something Mac Mini-specific > indeed to investigate. Yup, the tree I tested was current -git with the two commits mentioned in this thread: drm: Reduce the number of retries whilst reading EDIDs drm: give up on edid retries when i2c bus is not responding applied separately on top of it. Linus _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
