Hello, On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 13:05:34 -0500 Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 19:08 +0300, Andrew Shadura wrote: > > Checking for just two variants of standard timings for > > 1366x768 isn't quite correct, let's check for ranges > > instead. > I... doubt it? Standard timing descriptors are a tuple of > * width in character cells (ie, 8 pixels) > * one of four aspect ratios > * refresh rate > So you're only ever going to have 1360 or 1368, and then in integer > math I think you could only possibly ever get: > a) 1360 * 9 / 16 = 765 > b) 1368 * 9 / 16 = 769 > If you're managing to get something else I'm a little concerned, and > would really be delighted to see the EDID block for it. Well, my fault, I haven't read the code 10 lines above :) Indeed, that's not STD, it's DTD. And I'm not sure how to fix it then, but DTD gives 1360x768, and that isn't quite correct. -- WBR, Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
