Re: [PATCH 18/25] drm/msm/dpu: merge RM interface reservation helpers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2018-10-09 09:50, Jordan Crouse wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 09:27:35PM -0700, Jeykumar Sankaran wrote:
we don't have enough reasons why the HW block looping's
cannot happen in the same function. So merge them.

looping's -> looping. So there are reasons one might break them out
but not interesting ones?

Not just yet. Once we start supporting different type of connectors such
as writeback & DP and the parsing logic for the respective type of
INTF grows up, we *may* want to split this up.

Thanks
Jeykumar S.

Signed-off-by: Jeykumar Sankaran <jsanka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c | 63
++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
index a79456c..bb59250 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
@@ -435,52 +435,39 @@ static int _dpu_rm_reserve_ctls(
 	return 0;
 }

-static struct dpu_rm_hw_blk *_dpu_rm_reserve_intf(
-		struct dpu_rm *rm,
-		uint32_t id,
-		enum dpu_hw_blk_type type)
-{
-	struct dpu_rm_hw_blk *iter;
-	struct list_head *blk_list = &rm->hw_blks[DPU_HW_BLK_INTF];
-
-	/* Find the block entry in the rm, and note the reservation */
-	list_for_each_entry(iter, blk_list, list)  {
-		if (iter->hw->id != id || iter->in_use)
-			continue;
-
-		trace_dpu_rm_reserve_intf(iter->hw->id, DPU_HW_BLK_INTF);
-
-		break;
-	}
-
-	/* Shouldn't happen since intfs are fixed at probe */
-	if (!iter) {
-		DPU_ERROR("couldn't find type %d id %d\n", type, id);
-		return NULL;
-	}
-
-	return iter;
-}
-
-static int _dpu_rm_reserve_intf_related_hw(
+static int _dpu_rm_reserve_intfs(
 		struct dpu_rm *rm,
 		struct dpu_crtc_state *dpu_cstate,
 		struct dpu_encoder_hw_resources *hw_res)
 {
-	struct dpu_rm_hw_blk *blk;
+	struct dpu_rm_hw_blk *iter;
+	struct list_head *blk_list = &rm->hw_blks[DPU_HW_BLK_INTF];
 	int i, num_intfs = 0;

 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(hw_res->intfs); i++) {
+		struct dpu_rm_hw_blk *intf_blk = NULL;
+
 		if (hw_res->intfs[i] == INTF_MODE_NONE)
 			continue;

-		blk = _dpu_rm_reserve_intf(rm, i + INTF_0,
-				DPU_HW_BLK_INTF);
-		if (!blk)
-			return -ENAVAIL;
+		list_for_each_entry(iter, blk_list, list)  {
+			if (iter->in_use)
+				continue;
+
+			if (iter->hw->id == (INTF_0 + i)) {
+				intf_blk = iter;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+
+		if (!intf_blk)
+			return -EINVAL;

-		blk->in_use = true;
-		dpu_cstate->hw_intfs[num_intfs++] =
to_dpu_hw_intf(blk->hw);
+		intf_blk->in_use = true;
+		dpu_cstate->hw_intfs[num_intfs++] =
+
to_dpu_hw_intf(intf_blk->hw);
+
+		trace_dpu_rm_reserve_intf(intf_blk->hw->id,
DPU_HW_BLK_INTF);
 	}

 	dpu_cstate->num_intfs = num_intfs;
@@ -507,9 +494,11 @@ static int _dpu_rm_make_reservation(
 		return ret;
 	}

-	ret = _dpu_rm_reserve_intf_related_hw(rm, dpu_cstate,
&reqs->hw_res);
-	if (ret)
+	ret = _dpu_rm_reserve_intfs(rm, dpu_cstate, &reqs->hw_res);
+	if (ret) {
+		DPU_ERROR("unable to find appropriate INTF\n");

Since there is only once consumer of this function, I would move this
error
message down into the sub-function and provide more debug information -
like
which INTF wasn't found.

 		return ret;
+	}

And you don't need to return ret in this block - you can just drop out to
the
bottom.


 	return ret;
 }

--
Jeykumar S
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux