https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201275 --- Comment #18 from quirin.blaeser@xxxxxxxxxx --- (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #9) > I don't think this is a bug. The problem is, prior to that patch, the > display component was requesting minimum clocks that were 10x too low. This > saved power, but led to display problems on some systems because the clocks > were too low to sustain the display requirements. so - 93b100ddd... fools DC + 93b100ddd... fools PM from my point of view scaling clock values just happens at the wrong place. So we may have to find different points in code from where smuX_get_XXX gets called by PM _or_ DC, may be in Firmware. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
