On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 9:39 AM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 04/10/2018 20:10, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 5:05 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 04/10/2018 12:09, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:42:43AM +0200, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> >>>> The mode_config max_width/max_height determines the maximum framebuffer
> >>>> size the pixel reader can handle. But the values were set thinking they
> >>>> were determining the maximum screen dimensions.
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch changes the values to the maximum height/width the CANVAS block
> >>>> can handle rounded to some coherent values.
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: a41e82e6c457 ("drm/meson: Add support for components")
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>
> >>> It's both. Grep for all the callers of ->fill_modes and you'll see that
> >>> this limit is also used to filter max screen sizes.
> >>>
> >>> If you want to change this, then I think we need a new
> >>> mode_config.fb_max_width/height, which if non-zero, would extend the limit
> >>> for fbs.
> >>>
> >>> There's also the problem that if you extend this for fbs, then there's no
> >>> check anymore in the atomic_commit paths (or legacy modeset), so that
> >>> needs to be addressed somehow too.
> >>
> >> What about adding optionals mode_config.fb_max_width/height and update
> >> drm_internal_framebuffer_create() to use these if non-0 or fallback
> >> to the mode_config max_width/max_height.
> >
> > That's what I meant. Except you also need to then fix the gap you've
> > opened in atomic_check, and validate the mode size against
> > mode_config.max_width/height.
>
> OK, won't this be enough ?
> --- a/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mode_config.h
> @@ -333,6 +333,8 @@ struct drm_mode_config_funcs {
> * @min_height: minimum fb pixel height on this device
> * @max_width: maximum fb pixel width on this device
> * @max_height: maximum fb pixel height on this device
> + * @max_fb_width: maximum fb buffer width if differs from max_width
> + * @max_fb_height: maximum fb buffer height if differs from max_height
> * @funcs: core driver provided mode setting functions
> * @fb_base: base address of the framebuffer
> * @poll_enabled: track polling support for this device
> @@ -508,6 +510,7 @@ struct drm_mode_config {
>
> int min_width, min_height;
> int max_width, max_height;
> + int max_fb_width, max_fb_height;
> const struct drm_mode_config_funcs *funcs;
> resource_size_t fb_base;
>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_framebuffer.c
> @@ -283,14 +283,20 @@ drm_internal_framebuffer_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> - if ((config->min_width > r->width) || (r->width > config->max_width)) {
> + if ((config->min_width > r->width) ||
> + (!config->max_fb_width && r->width > config->max_width) ||
> + (config->max_fb_width && r->width > config->max_fb_width)) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("bad framebuffer width %d, should be >= %d && <= %d\n",
> - r->width, config->min_width, config->max_width);
> + r->width, config->min_width, config->max_fb_width ?
> + config->max_fb_width : config->max_width);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
> - if ((config->min_height > r->height) || (r->height > config->max_height)) {
> + if ((config->min_height > r->height) ||
> + (!config->max_fb_height && r->height > config->max_height) ||
> + (config->max_fb_height && r->height > config->max_fb_height)) {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("bad framebuffer height %d, should be >= %d && <= %d\n",
> - r->height, config->min_height, config->max_height);
> + r->height, config->min_height, config->max_fb_height ?
> + config->max_fb_height : config->max_height);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> and in the driver :
>
> + drm->mode_config.max_width = 4096;
> + drm->mode_config.max_height = 3840;
> + drm->mode_config.max_fb_width = 16384;
> + drm->mode_config.max_fb_height = 8192;
>
> With this I leave the mode filtering intact.
Not enough. See
https://dri.freedesktop.org/docs/drm/gpu/drm-kms-helpers.html#c.drm_connector_helper_funcs
and scroll down to mode_valid. You need to filter modes both in the
detect paths, and the atomic_check paths.
Detect is explicitly filtered out, but atomic_check was only
implicitly filtered, through the max fb size checks. Ok, you could
light up a mode that's bigger than max fb, but in practice, no
userspace ever did that. But with your code we're missing crucial
validation now, and userspace could fall over that. What I think we
need is to add mode filter against mode_config.max_width/height in
drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(). Probably best to stuff that into
the mode_valid() function.
Cheers, Daniel
>
> Neil
>
>
> > -Daniel
> >
> >>
> >> Neil
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Bunch of igt to make sure we're not missing anything would be sweet on
> >>> top, e.g. e.g. trying to set a mode over the limit and making sure it
> >>> fails.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers, Daniel
> >>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_drv.c | 4 ++--
> >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_drv.c
> >>>> index d344312..2e29968 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_drv.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_drv.c
> >>>> @@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ static int meson_drv_bind_master(struct device *dev, bool has_components)
> >>>> goto free_drm;
> >>>>
> >>>> drm_mode_config_init(drm);
> >>>> - drm->mode_config.max_width = 3840;
> >>>> - drm->mode_config.max_height = 2160;
> >>>> + drm->mode_config.max_width = 16384;
> >>>> + drm->mode_config.max_height = 8192;
> >>>> drm->mode_config.funcs = &meson_mode_config_funcs;
> >>>>
> >>>> /* Hardware Initialization */
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.7.4
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> dri-devel mailing list
> >>>> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dri-devel mailing list
> >> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
