On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 5:59 AM Giulio Benetti
<giulio.benetti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> At the moment, the check of tcon->panel to be valid is wrong. IS_ERR()
> has been used, but that macro doesn't check if tcon->panel pointer is
> null or not, but check if tcon->panel is between -1 and -4095(MAX_ERRNO).
>
> Remove IS_ERR() from tcon->panel checking and let "if (tcon->panel)" as
> condition to check if it's a pointer not null.
There's actually more than one occurance of this error:
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c: if (!IS_ERR(tcon->panel)) {
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_lvds.c: if (!IS_ERR(tcon->panel)) {
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.c: if (!IS_ERR(tcon->panel)) {
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_rgb.c: if (!IS_ERR(tcon->panel)) {
These four are responsible for enabling and disabling the panel.
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c: if (!IS_ERR(tcon->panel)) {
All this looks like it was left over from commit ebc9446135671 ("drm: convert
drivers to use drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge"). We have checks against tcon->panel
in several places and not all of them were converted.
ChenYu
> Signed-off-by: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> index c78cd35a1294..e4b3bd0307ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_tcon.c
> @@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static void sun4i_tcon0_mode_set_rgb(struct sun4i_tcon *tcon,
> * Following code is a way to avoid quirks all around TCON
> * and DOTCLOCK drivers.
> */
> - if (!IS_ERR(tcon->panel)) {
> + if (tcon->panel) {
> struct drm_panel *panel = tcon->panel;
> struct drm_connector *connector = panel->connector;
> struct drm_display_info display_info = connector->display_info;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
