于 2018年9月12日 GMT+08:00 下午10:49:12, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> 写到: >On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 4:44 PM Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> 于 2018年9月4日 GMT+08:00 下午4:40:56, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> 写到: >> >On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 3:27 PM Jernej Skrabec ><jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxx> >> >wrote: >> >> >> >> From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> As we have already binding for the H6 system controller, add its >node >> >> to the device tree. >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@xxxxxxx> >> >> [fixed compatible string] >> >> Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxx> >> > >> >Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> >> >> By the way can these patches be applied first? (patches >> related to syscon). >> >> They're also needed for EMAC. > >Applied. > >BTW, the H6 system control EMAC register also has the internal PHY >related controls seen on H3/H5. IIRC you previously mentioned that >they have no effect? Yes, because the "internal PHY" on H6 is on AC200. The internal/external mux bit has effect (although it will mux to a non-existent PHY when switching to "internal", render EMAC not usable), but it also has effect on A64 (same effect with H6), on which it's not documented. > >ChenYu > >_______________________________________________ >linux-arm-kernel mailing list >linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
