Comment # 7
on bug 105333
from Timothy Arceri
(In reply to Axel Davy from comment #6) > Given the regression bisect found the issue came with a radeonsi patch, I > reassign to radeonsi. Maybe the patch introduces a small difference in the > driver behaviour that regresses nine ? Well you can do that but it's unlikely to be investigated by anyone not interested in gallium-nine which is why I moved it there.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
