On 06.09.2018 04:07, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 8:32 PM Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 05.09.2018 00:44, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> Good point! I actually really don't like that we use the same flags here >> but from a different perspective. Especially since the flags defines >> document things differently: >> >> /* drive data on pos. edge */ >> #define DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE (1<<2) >> /* drive data on neg. edge */ >> #define DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE (1<<3) > > Maybe a stupid comment from my side, but can't we just change the > documentation to match the usecases? > > /* Trigger pixel data latch on positive edge */ > #define DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE (1<<2) > >> Using the opposite perspective would also need translation in crtc >> drivers... So far no driver uses sampling_edge. >> >> I would prefer if we always use the meaning as documented by the flags. >> >> I guess we would need to convert DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE -> >> DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE. >> >> Linus Walleij, you added sampling edge, any thoughts? > > I just thought it was generally useful to have triggering edge encoded > into the bridge as it makes it clear that this edge is something > that is a delayed version of the driving edge which is subject to > clock skew caused by the speed of electrons in silicon and > copper and slew rate caused by parasitic capacitance. Ok, I read a bit up on the history of bridge timing, especially: https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg155618.html IMHO, this got overengineered. For displays we do not need all that setup/sample delay timing information, and much longer cables are in use. So why is all that needed for bridges? For Linus case, the THS8134(A/B) data sheet I found (revised March 2010) clearly states: Clock input. A rising edge on CLK latches RPr0-7, GY0-7, BPb0-7. So we need to drive on negative edge, hence DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE should be used, which makes the pl111 driver setting TIM2_IPC: http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0121d/index.html > DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_POSEDGE is the right value for my use cases, but it > doesn't match how the ADV7123 operates. Using DRM_BUS_FLAG_PIXDATA_NEGEDGE > would match the hardware, but would break display for some modes, depending on > the display clock frequency as the internal 8.5ns output delay applied to a > falling clock edge would fall right into the 1.7ns setup + hold time window of > the ADV7123 around the rising edge. I can't test this right now as I don't > have local access to boards using the ADV7123, but from a quick calculation > that ignores the PCB transmission delay modes with frequencies between 57MHz > and 71MHz could break if the data was output on the falling edge of the clock. If clocks vs. data signal are really that much off on R-Car DU, then parallel displays must have the very same issue... Are you sure that only the clock signal has an output delay? And that this output delay is a fixed value, clock independent? Typically, delays apply to all signals equally, and often are clock frequency dependent... Without really looking at the signals, I would not jump to conclusions here! I am pretty sure that driving on negative edge works just as well. -- Stefan > > Yours, > Linus Walleij _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
