Am 30.08.2018 um 08:48 schrieb Chunming Zhou:
That is certainly totally nonsense. dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling()
is the function who is calling this callback.
Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
If there are no objections I'm going to push patches #1-#4 to drm-misc-next.
Independent of the timeline sync object work they look like nice
cleanups to me.
Regards,
Christian.
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
index 3a8837c49639..d17ed75ac7e2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
@@ -184,7 +184,6 @@ static const char *drm_syncobj_null_fence_get_name(struct dma_fence *fence)
static bool drm_syncobj_null_fence_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
{
- dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(fence);
return !dma_fence_is_signaled(fence);
}
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
