Re: [ANNOUNCE] libdrm 2.4.94

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:13 AM Michel Dänzer <michel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2018-08-24 12:37 a.m., Kristian H. Kristensen wrote:
> > Benjamin Gaignard (2):
> >       tests/modetest: Add atomic support
> >       tests/util: Add support for stm module
> >
> > Christian König (7):
> >       amdgpu: stop using the hash table for fd_tab
> >       amdgpu: add handle table implementation v2
> >       amdgpu: use handle table for KMS handles
> >       amdgpu: use handle table for flink names
> >       amdgpu: remove the hash table implementation
> >       amdgpu: always add all BOs to handle table
> >       amdgpu: fix off by one in handle_table_insert
> >
> > Junwei Zhang (5):
> >       amdgpu: add bo from user memory to handle table
> >       amdgpu: add a function to find bo by cpu mapping (v2)
> >       tests/amdgpu: add test for finding bo by CPU mapping
> >       amdgpu: free flink bo in bo import
> >       amdgpu: add a function to create amdgpu bo internally (v4)
> >
> > Kristian H. Kristensen (1):
> >       Bump to version 2.4.94
> >
> > Likun Gao (1):
> >       amdgpu: Disable deadlock test suite for RV
> >
> > Michel Dänzer (2):
> >       amdgpu: Use uint32_t i in amdgpu_find_bo_by_cpu_mapping
> >       amdgpu: Eliminate void* arithmetic in amdgpu_find_bo_by_cpu_mapping
> >
> > Mike Lothian (1):
> >       libdrm: Fix amdgpu build failure
> >
> > Rob Clark (2):
> >       freedreno: don't leak stateobj rb refs
> >       freedreno: fix use-after-free with stateobj rb's
> >
> > Rodrigo Vivi (1):
> >       intel: Add a new CFL PCI ID.
> >
> > Tanmay Shah (1):
> >       libdrm: add msm drm uapi header
>
> Would have been nice to wait for
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/245762/ to land, or at least
> give a little heads up, before making a release.

I don't know what all is pending for libdrm, but I know that we've
agreed on a very low bar for when to release libdrm:

   "The release criteria for libdrm is essentially "if you need a release,
    make one".  There is no designated release engineer or maintainer.
    Anybody is free to make a release if there's a certain feature or bug
    fix they need in a released version of libdrm."

Kristian


> --
> Earthling Michel Dänzer               |               http://www.amd.com
> Libre software enthusiast             |             Mesa and X developer
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux