yeah, that's probably cleaner (I guess it'll avoid the -*), but it should have the same effect. I'll make the change. On Feb 1, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 15:25:20 -0800, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > >> This fixes a failure in 'make check' found by the tinderbox when trying to >> build this code on Linux/ppc. This code is only designed to run on >> Intel platforms, so don't even bother building it if we're not in that set. >> >> Found-by: Tinderbox >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> It now causes the intel bits to not build on my Linux/ppc tinderbox, but I'd >> appreciate someone verifying that it does the right thing on intel boxes as >> well. >> >> configure.ac | 5 ++++- >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac >> index 773167f..f5ebc1d 100644 >> --- a/configure.ac >> +++ b/configure.ac >> @@ -250,7 +250,10 @@ if test "x$INTEL" != "xno" -o "x$RADEON" != "xno"; then >> >> else >> if test "x$INTEL" != "xno"; then >> - INTEL=yes >> + case $host_os in >> + i?86-*|x86_64-*) INTEL=yes ;; >> + *) INTEL=no ;; >> + esac >> fi > > don't you want to check host_cpu rather than host_os? > > Cheers, > Julien > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
